I drew a comic, here’s the first page. Read the rest online at Feminartsy.
I have a couple of new gocco prints, including the one in the previous post, for sale in the brand new Take Care mail order shop. There will be more coming soon!
On 24 May join us for this free gig and the launch of Plastic Knife #12 at:
Junior Gazette, Level 1/91 Railway Pde, Marrickville.
Zinesters with acoustic guitars!
$1 cups of ginger beer!
Some new paintings by Emma D!
The gig takes place on the eve of this:
The OTHER WORLDS ZINE FAIR is happening in two weeks! For those who haven’t heard, Other Worlds was set up as an alternative to the MCA Zine Fair, which is happening on the same day. A few of us Sydney zinesters decided to boycott the MCA fair due to MCA’s relationship with a company called Transfield, who operate services in Australia’s offshore detention centres. These detention centres have been described as an “experiment in the active creation of horror to deter people from trying” [to seek asylum] in Australia. We don’t want our zines to have anything to do with a company that profits from this bad business. From a small group of individual zinesters we’re now a fifty table strong zine fair. We hope you can come, and help spread the word – the poster above was designed by Nicky Minus!
55, Sydney’s only gallery, have launched a pozible thing to raise money for their rent and stuff.
Without 55 Dexter Fletcher would not have been able to show the overly large Careers in Retail posters or ‘pun based anti-landlord art’ (thanks for that description, Lou) An A-Z of the Non-Property Owning Classes Represented as a Paint Chart, nor would many other less stupid art works by better looking, more serious artists have seen the light of day.
GIVE THEM MONEY. If you pledge to buy one of the lucky dip t-shirts you might even get an exclusive Dexter Fletcher design! WOW!
(Reposted from takecarezines.org)
Hey folks, I’m just dragging this up (with a few changes to the wording) from the bottom of the post before last where it was first published. In conversations I had on the weekend at the Sydney Anarchist Book Fair and Canberra Zine Emporium (thank you to the organisers of both events) people were overwhelmingly supportive of the idea of boycotting the MCA zine fair over the MCA’s relationship with Transfield, but there was some confusion about precisely what that relationship is. Creating confusion is a pretty good way of obscuring facts, but anyway: this is the information I have found with my limited internet searching abilities:
In a pay-walled article on ArtsHub, the MCA called our use of the word ‘sponsorship’ to describe their relationship with Transfield a “factual inaccurancy”, stating instead that Transfield are a ‘Corporate Member’.
‘Corporate Members’ are listed on the ‘Sponsorship’ page of the MCA website.
Transfield are listed on page 60 of the most recent (2012) MCA annual report in the section for ‘Sponsorship, Donations, Marketing and Public Relations’, as a ‘Corporate Member’.
The MCA are listed on the ‘Community Involvement – Sponsorships’ page of the Transfield website: “Transfield Holdings has been a corporate sponsor of the Museum of Contemporary Art since 2004.” (accessed 24/3/14, emphasis mine. Note that the Transfield domain name and the Transfield logo at the top of the web-page do not make a distinction between ‘Transfield Holdings’, ‘Transfield Services’ or ‘Transfield Foundation’.)
So, the word ‘sponsorship’ seems to have a slippery definition, depending on when, how and by whom it is used. Clearly Transfield consider their corporate membership to be a variety of sponsorship. The MCA, perhaps, feels differently – although their own publicly accessible information on their sponsors etc is ambiguous. Whatever the difference (or lack of) between ‘sponsorship’ and ‘corporate membership’ in this case, the MCA and Transfield have a brand relationship. As the MCA website outlines, Corporate Membership provides an opportunity to:
“[a]lign with Australia’s leading contemporary arts brand and an exciting range of collections” and “[d]evelop and enhance relationships with key clients and stakeholders”.
What would a bit of amateur research be without a visit to Wikipedia? From the entry on brand equity (or as it’s sometimes known, brand value):
“Brand equity is a phrase used in the marketing industry which describes the value of having a well-known brand name, based on the idea that the owner of a well-known brand name can generate more money from products with that brand name than from products with a less well known name…”